# Anti-detect browser Chromium version: how far behind? > Real Chrome updates itself, so an engine a few majors old claims a browser almost nobody runs. Our move from 153 to 154 took a 93-minute rebuild. Source: https://mosaicbrowser.com/blog/anti-detect-chromium-version-lag ## How far behind Chrome stable is your anti-detect browser? Real Chrome updates itself, so an engine a few majors old claims a browser almost nobody runs. Our move from 153 to 154 took a 93-minute rebuild. ![93 min: A version bump, measured: one near-full rebuild, beside a screenshot: mosaic settings showing the installed Tesseract Chrome engine and its version](https://mosaicbrowser.com/covers/anti-detect-chromium-version-lag.webp) An anti-detect browser should claim a Chrome major that real people are running right now, which in practice means the current stable release or the one just before it. Google Chrome updates itself in the background and ships a new major roughly every four weeks, so the population of real Chrome visitors bunches up at the newest versions. An engine that claims last quarter's major is claiming a browser that almost nobody still has. We moved our engine from Chrome 153 to 154 on 19 September 2026; the near-full rebuild took 93 minutes, timed on the build machine, and the rest of this post is why that number matters and how to check the version your own tool claims. ## Why the version is a fingerprint The Chrome major is in the User-Agent, in the `brands` list every site receives, and in the full version list a page can ask for. On its own it is not unique to anyone. What matters is where it puts you in the crowd. A browser that updates itself spends very little time on any one version, so the share of real traffic still on an old major falls away quickly after the next one lands. A profile claiming that old major is one of a shrinking few, and the fewer people share a value, the more it narrows down who you are. It gets worse when the version is claimed rather than real. Changing the User-Agent string is easy. Changing what the engine underneath can do is not. Each Chrome major adds and removes web platform features, and a page can test for them directly. A browser that says it is the newest Chrome while missing an API that version shipped is contradicting itself, and a consistency check is built to look for exactly that. Mosaic is a desktop app Email yourself the link and open it on your computer. [How it works: Its own Chromium](https://mosaicbrowser.com/features/engine) ## What we do instead of claiming Mosaic does not dress an old engine up as a new one. Every profile's claimed major is pinned to the engine's real one, so the version a site sees is the version that is actually answering. That makes the engine version a decision about every profile at once, and the only way to claim a newer Chrome is to build one. Building one means taking our patch series to the new source. Tesseract Chrome is stock Chromium source with a series of more than sixty patches applied, and every new major moves some of the code they touch. Nine majors of drift, from 144 to 153, rejected 11 of 51 patches at the time, and eight of those eleven were nothing more than include blocks that had moved. The single step from 153 to 154 added three new kinds of breakage: a switches file the series added a constant to was deleted upstream, a build target a patch added sources to was dismantled, and a struct field a patch wrote to was removed. The last one is the dangerous kind, because the tree compiles once the write is dropped and the value it carried silently stops arriving. Then the build. Measured on our build Mac on 19 September 2026: ``` version bump 153 -> 154, near-full rebuild 93 minutes one patch changed, incremental + relink 1-2 minutes package + install ~2 minutes ``` ## Newest is not always the right target There is one limit on "as new as possible", and it comes from how we test. Our stock comparison check runs a profile against a branded Google Chrome of the same major installed on the same Mac, and it refuses to compare across majors. While Chrome stable is still rolling out and the installed Chrome is a major behind, building the newer engine would leave us with nothing to measure it against. So we take the newest version we can measure, which is usually stable and occasionally the one before it for a few days. An engine we cannot measure is worth less than a current one we can. ## How to check your anti-detect browser's Chromium version You can read the claim yourself in a minute, in any profile of any anti-detect browser. 1. Open a page, open DevTools and run `navigator.userAgent`. Note the number after `Chrome/`. 2. Run `navigator.userAgentData.getHighEntropyValues(['fullVersionList']).then(console.log)`. The `Google Chrome` and `Chromium` entries should carry the same major as the User-Agent, with a full four-part version. 3. Compare that major with the current stable release on Google's Chromium Dash release schedule. One major behind is normal during a rollout. Several behind is a browser few real people run. 4. If the vendor publishes its engine's real Chromium version, check that it matches what the profile claims. A claim newer than the engine is the contradiction described above. Step 4 depends on how each vendor names its engine. Multilogin numbers each Mimic core after the Chrome major it is built from, and we read those numbers against Chrome's own release days in [Mimic and its core numbers](https://mosaicbrowser.com/blog/mimic-core-versions). Kameleo runs two engines with their own names, covered in [Junglefox and Chroma](https://mosaicbrowser.com/blog/kameleo-junglefox). And an engine that stops being updated at all is a different problem again, the subject of [what a legacy engine means](https://mosaicbrowser.com/blog/stealthfox-legacy). If you are still choosing a tool, the version question belongs next to the others in [what an anti-detect browser is](https://mosaicbrowser.com/guides/what-is-an-anti-detect-browser): which engine, whose source, and how often it moves. ## Questions ### Why does the Chromium version of an anti-detect browser matter? Because real Chrome updates itself, so most real visitors are on the newest major or the one before it. A browser claiming a major from months ago sits outside the crowd it is meant to hide in, and its features can contradict the version it claims. ### Can an anti-detect browser just claim a newer Chrome version? It can change the User-Agent and client hints, but the engine underneath still has the old version's features and behaviour. A page that tests for an API added in the claimed major will find it missing, and then the claim and the browser disagree. ### How do I see which Chrome version my anti-detect browser claims? Open DevTools on any page and read navigator.userAgent and the result of navigator.userAgentData.getHighEntropyValues(['fullVersionList']). Compare the major with the current stable release on Google's Chromium Dash. ### How long does it take Mosaic to move to a new Chrome major? The move from 153 to 154 was measured on 19 September 2026 at 93 minutes for a near-full rebuild, after rebasing the patch series. A change to one patch after that is an incremental build of one to two minutes. ## Related [Mimic, Multilogin's Chromium, and its core numbers](https://mosaicbrowser.com/blog/mimic-core-versions): A Mimic core number is the Chrome major it is built on. Set the date a core shipped against the date that Chrome major reached stable, and you have the lag. [Multilogin froze Stealthfox, and what a legacy engine means](https://mosaicbrowser.com/blog/stealthfox-legacy): Multilogin lists Stealthfox as a legacy core and points users to Mimic. A browser core that stops updating turns its own version into a signal. [Junglefox and Chroma, Kameleo's two engines](https://mosaicbrowser.com/blog/kameleo-junglefox): Junglefox is Kameleo's Firefox-based engine, beside Chroma, its Chromium one. A Firefox profile needs an engine that really is Firefox, and keeping one is work. [What is an anti-detect browser?](https://mosaicbrowser.com/guides/what-is-an-anti-detect-browser): An anti-detect browser gives each profile its own fingerprint, proxy and cookies, so sites see separate visitors. What it changes, how, and its limits. [Is Camoufox still maintained? Reading the repository](https://mosaicbrowser.com/blog/is-camoufox-maintained): Is Camoufox still maintained? Its repository answers better than forums do: compare the latest release's date and Firefox base with today's Firefox. [SunBrowser and FlowerBrowser, AdsPower's two engines](https://mosaicbrowser.com/blog/sunbrowser-flowerbrowser): SunBrowser is AdsPower's Chromium engine, FlowerBrowser its Firefox one. Choosing Firefox changes the handshake, headers and extensions a profile runs. [What Orbita is, from GoLogin's own pages](https://mosaicbrowser.com/blog/orbita-browser): Orbita is the Chromium-based browser a GoLogin profile opens in. GoLogin says it tracks Chrome releases, and each profile is updated on its own.  ## Mosaic, on your own computer The browser this blog is about: its own Chromium, fingerprints from real machines and a proxy exit per profile. Free holds 3 profiles. Pro is $49 a month for any number. Mosaic is a desktop app Email yourself the link and open it on your computer.